Start here
Is this useful for you?
Yes—if you need to budget certificate funding, challenge a supplier or customer assumption, prepare a management or client briefing, compare sourcing options, or decide what company evidence to collect. No—if you want a universal pass-through percentage, a recommended contract clause, a legal conclusion or a prediction produced without your goods, emissions, prices, contracts and market constraints.
EU importer / declarant
Decision: Separate certificate cash needs from the portion that can be repriced, negotiated or absorbed.
What to collect next: Goods, quantities, emissions method, origin, eligible carbon price, purchase timing, supplier terms and customer pricing constraints.
Non-EU producer
Decision: Test whether verified lower emissions or eligible carbon-price evidence changes competitiveness enough to justify action.
What to collect next: Installation-level emissions, verification path, carbon-price payment/rebate evidence, EU customer mix and alternative markets.
Procurement / supply chain
Decision: Compare supplier total-cost ranges without assuming the lowest quoted goods price remains cheapest.
What to collect next: Supplier emissions evidence, contract renewal dates, substitution options, lead times, concentration and quality constraints.
Finance / treasury
Decision: Model certificate funding timing separately from annual expense and commercial recovery.
What to collect next: Import calendar, quarterly holdings, expected surrender, price assumptions, repurchase limits and working-capital policy.
Sales / commercial
Decision: Choose where evidence supports a surcharge, repricing discussion or margin decision.
What to collect next: Customer elasticity, contract adjustment rights, competitor exposure, product contribution margins and renewal windows.
Downstream manufacturer
Decision: Identify products where covered inputs are material and substitution is commercially feasible.
What to collect next: Bill of materials, input shares, alternative grades/suppliers, redesign time and customer pass-through constraints.
Adviser / association
Decision: Build scenarios that travel with assumptions rather than repeating a universal payer claim.
What to collect next: Actor map, legal status, model contract, sector/product evidence, sensitivity ranges and explicit non-inferences.
Policy / research
Decision: Distinguish statutory incidence, modelled pass-through and observed outcomes in evaluation.
What to collect next: Prices, margins, quantities, sourcing, emissions methods and comparator data over time.
What this report can help you produce
- ✓ An actor-by-actor cost map
- ✓ A certificate funding timeline
- ✓ Low, base and high scenarios
- ✓ A contract and evidence question list
- ✓ A sourced management/client briefing
- ✓ A list of claims that must remain held
Executive answer
Who pays? Seven conclusions the evidence can support
Legal actor
The authorised CBAM declarant holds the central declaration and certificate obligationsC-001
Not final incidence
That legal role does not prove who ultimately bears the economic burdenC-026
Evidence changes the amount
Emissions method and eligible foreign carbon-price evidence affect certificates to surrenderC-005
Cash has its own calendar
Purchase, quarterly holding, surrender, repurchase and cancellation occur on different datesC-011
Pass-through is conditional
Market structure, supply, demand, product and time affect how much cost movesC-018
Suppliers may absorb some
Exporter price or margin can adjust when the buyer has negotiating power—but need notC-021
Downstream can carry it
Covered-input price changes can propagate beyond direct importers under explicit assumptionsC-022
The useful answer is therefore a map, not a slogan. Start with the statutory actor and certificate quantity. Then model commercial recovery and behaviour separately. A company may fund certificates while recovering part through supplier negotiation or customer prices, absorbing part in margin, and changing part through sourcing or volume. Another company in the same sector can reach a different result.
Part 1
What does ‘pays’ mean in your question?
Most arguments about CBAM incidence fail before the numbers begin: people answer different questions with the same word. A customs team may mean statutory responsibility. Treasury may mean the date cash is required. Procurement may mean who concedes on price. Finance may mean where the expense lands. An economist may mean the final distribution after prices and quantities adjust.
Figure 1
Analytical frameworkSeven different questions hide inside ‘Who pays?’
- 1
Legal obligation
Which person is assigned the duty by adopted law?
- 2
Initial cash payment
Whose account funds certificate purchases and any separately established platform fees?
- 3
Contractual allocation
How do commercial terms allocate data, price-adjustment and performance risk?
- 4
Economic pass-through
How much of a cost change moves into upstream or downstream prices?
- 5
Margin absorption
Which actor retains some cost through a lower margin or net price?
- 6
Sourcing and demand responses
How do sourcing, substitution, quantities, investment or market exit change?
- 7
Final economic incidence
How is the burden distributed after price, volume, margin and behavioural changes?
CBAM Pulse framework. Legal, operational and economic layers are deliberately separate. It is a decision map, not a legal conclusion or a prediction of final incidence. C-026
CBAM Pulse · research cut-off 10 August 2026 · cbampulse.com/guides/who-pays-for-cbam
| Layer | Question | Must not be treated as |
|---|---|---|
| Legal obligation | Which person is assigned the duty by adopted law? | the actor that ultimately loses margin or purchasing power |
| Initial cash payment | Whose account funds certificate purchases and any separately established platform fees? | the final economic bearer after prices and volumes adjust |
| Contractual allocation | How do commercial terms allocate data, price-adjustment and performance risk? | a transfer of statutory responsibility |
| Economic pass-through | How much of a cost change moves into upstream or downstream prices? | a fixed percentage across products, firms or time |
| Margin absorption | Which actor retains some cost through a lower margin or net price? | the only possible response |
| Sourcing and demand responses | How do sourcing, substitution, quantities, investment or market exit change? | an observed response merely because a model permits it |
| Final economic incidence | How is the burden distributed after price, volume, margin and behavioural changes? | the name on the CBAM account or invoice |
Part 2
Who is legally responsible for the declaration and certificates?
Under the consolidated Regulation, goods are imported by an authorised CBAM declarant. An EU-established importer acting in its own name can occupy that role. If it appoints an indirect customs representative, the representative becomes the authorised declarant only where the statutory conditions apply and it agrees. If the importer is not established in a Member State, the indirect customs representative must obtain that status.C-001C-002C-027 The actor in that role submits the declaration and purchases, holds and surrenders the required certificates.
Submission work can be delegated, but the authorised declarant remains responsible under the Regulation.C-003That distinction matters commercially: a service provider can prepare data or operate a process without becoming the final economic bearer—or erasing the declarant's statutory responsibility.
Safe to say
“The authorised CBAM declarant holds the statutory declaration and certificate obligations for the covered import flow, subject to the Regulation's representation and threshold rules.”
Not supported
“Because the importer is legally responsible, the importer necessarily absorbs the full economic cost.”
Threshold changes the liable population
Once the single mass-based threshold is exceeded, the current Regulation reaches all covered imports by that importer in the calendar year—not only later shipments. The exemption is per importer and does not apply to electricity or hydrogen.C-028 Use the threshold checker and its canonical guidance for the full scope decision.
Part 3
When does certificate cash move?
For 2026 imports, the statutory price attribution follows the quarter of import, but external certificate sales begin only on 1 February 2027 and first surrender is due by 30 September 2027.C-004C-032 The quarterly account-balance requirement also applies from 2027 under the specified reference methods.C-014 This makes “cost in the year of import” an incomplete treasury description: 2026 creates priced exposure while the EU certificate purchase occurs in 2027.
Figure 3
Adopted lawCash timing is not the same as the import date or final expense
- 01
2026
Imports create the first definitive-period embedded-emissions record
No general certificate sale during 2026
- 02
1 Feb 2027
Common-platform certificate sales begin
Cash timing starts to matter
- 03
From 2027
Quarter-end account holding requirement applies
At least 50% under the statutory reference routes
- 04
30 Sep 2027
First declaration and surrender for 2026
After carbon-price and free-allocation adjustments
- 05
31 Oct
Repurchase request deadline
Quantity limits and original purchase price apply
- 06
1 Nov
Statutory cancellation date for affected unused certificates
Cancellation can occur without compensation
Source: consolidated Regulation (EU) 2023/956, Articles 20–24, as amended. The timeline is a statutory mechanics map; accounting recognition, financing policy and contract recovery require separate analysis. C-011–C-016
CBAM Pulse · research cut-off 10 August 2026 · cbampulse.com/guides/who-pays-for-cbam
Repurchase is not an open secondary market. It is request-based, time-limited and quantity-limited; the statutory repurchase price is the original purchase price. Affected older certificates can be cancelled without compensation.C-015C-016 Those mechanics create separate questions about funding buffers, over-purchase, controls and accounting treatment.
Certificate expenditure is not the only possible cash demand. The Regulation allows common-platform costs to be financed by fees payable by authorised declarants, but this report does not estimate a fee amount.C-029 Certain newly established authorisation applicants can also face a guarantee requirement; that collateral is not a certificate purchase.C-033
Part 4
Where can the burden move across the chain?
Figure 2
Adopted law + synthesisThe statutory payer sits inside a longer commercial chain
Actor 1
Non-EU operator / producer
Abatement cost, measurement/verification cost, lower net price, changed volume or investment response.
Actor 2
Exporter / commercial seller
Price concessions, margin absorption, product mix, destination switching or changed volumes.
Actor 3
EU importer / authorised CBAM declarant
Certificate purchases, any separately established platform fees, internal administration and any price or margin response.
Actor 4
Procurement / downstream manufacturer
Higher input prices, supplier switching, redesign, inventory timing or downstream repricing.
Actor 5
Final customer / consumer
Higher price, substitution, lower quantity or no measurable change.
Evidence: operator/producer → authorised declarant
Certificate cash: authorised declarant → EU common platform
Price and margin: seller ↔ importer/downstream business ↔ customer
Decision rights: procurement sources, treasury funds, sales reprices
The authorised declarant holds the central certificate obligation; other actors can affect evidence, price, margin, sourcing and demand. Arrows show possible commercial transmission—not automatic legal transfer or guaranteed pass-through. C-001 C-021
CBAM Pulse · research cut-off 10 August 2026 · cbampulse.com/guides/who-pays-for-cbam
EU importer / authorised CBAM declarant
Role: Holds the legal declaration and certificate obligations when acting as the authorised declarant.
Cost channel: Certificate purchases, any separately established platform fees, internal administration and any price or margin response.
Boundary: Legal responsibility does not establish final economic incidence.
Indirect customs representative
Role: May act as authorised CBAM declarant under the Regulation's representation rules.
Cost channel: May fund or recharge operational costs according to its commercial arrangement.
Boundary: The exact statutory role depends on the importer's establishment and the representative's accepted role.
Non-EU operator / producer
Role: Can calculate installation emissions, ensure accredited verification, and prepare carbon-price information for optional disclosure.
Cost channel: Abatement cost, measurement/verification cost, lower net price, changed volume or investment response.
Boundary: Producing information does not itself make the operator the certificate-surrender actor or the accredited verifier.
Exporter / commercial seller
Role: Sets or negotiates the commercial price and terms for goods entering the EU chain.
Cost channel: Price concessions, margin absorption, product mix, destination switching or changed volumes.
Boundary: Exporter absorption is conditional, not automatic.
Procurement / downstream manufacturer
Role: Chooses suppliers and consumes covered goods as inputs.
Cost channel: Higher input prices, supplier switching, redesign, inventory timing or downstream repricing.
Boundary: An input-cost increase does not prove equal final-customer pass-through.
Final customer / consumer
Role: May face a downstream price or product-mix change.
Cost channel: Higher price, substitution, lower quantity or no measurable change.
Boundary: Consumer incidence must be evidenced; it is not implied by the legal payer.
Government / Union budget
Role: Receives certificate-sale revenue and administers the mechanism through the statutory system.
Cost channel: Revenue use, administrative cost and policy recycling choices can affect wider incidence.
Boundary: Gross revenue is not a measure of private welfare loss or border burden.
Government also appears in the map because certificate-sale revenue and its use can affect wider incidence. But gross revenue is not a welfare-loss estimate, an importer-loss estimate or proof about who bears the burden. The economic-impact report explains the model and revenue boundaries in more detail: What Economic Models Say About CBAM's Impact on Europe.
Part 5
What does the evidence say about pass-through?
There is no defensible universal CBAM pass-through rate in the reviewed evidence. The OECD supply-chain paper assumes 100% pass-through in its main analysis: firms fully adapt prices to compensate for cost increases.C-017 Its Box 3 summarises mixed-method EU ETS estimates—including ex-ante simulations and ex-post econometric studies—with wide ranges across sectors and studies.C-018 Those ranges are not observations of definitive-period CBAM incidence.
The same OECD paper cites an estimate that Belgian businesses passed through about 60% of cost increases on average in the short term, then uses a uniform 60% assumption as a sensitivity check.C-019 That does not make 60% a recommended CBAM base case. It shows why pass-through belongs in the sensitivity analysis rather than being silently fixed.
The OECD sensitivity materially changes its modelled EU value-added results when the uniform assumption moves from 100% to 60%. That result supports testing a range; it does not allocate a company bill among importer, supplier and consumer.C-020 The economic-impact report owns the exact Europe-wide model comparison.
Part 6
Why do bargaining power, elasticity and substitution matter?
A cost increase can be absorbed, repriced or avoided only through real commercial mechanisms. If an importer has credible alternative suppliers, volume leverage, specification flexibility or valuable market access, it may negotiate a lower exporter net price. The OECD paper explicitly notes this conditional exporter-absorption channel.C-021 If supply is concentrated, capacity is constrained or the product is hard to substitute, that leverage can disappear.
| Condition | More upstream absorption may be plausible when… | More downstream recovery may be plausible when… | Evidence to collect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier alternatives | credible substitutes compete for EU volume | alternatives face similar cost pressure | qualified suppliers, capacity, switching time |
| Buyer alternatives | customers can switch away from the importer's product | the product is hard to substitute | win/loss, elasticity, competitor exposure |
| Contract timing | supplier pricing is about to renew | customer repricing windows arrive first | renewals, indexation, notice periods |
| Margin structure | supplier margin can absorb a concession | buyer margin and value proposition permit recovery | contribution margin and price waterfalls |
| Time horizon | near-term contracts constrain response | longer-run redesign and repricing are feasible | implementation lead times and investments |
This table is a question framework, not a prediction. Market power can vary by product, customer, location and month—even inside one company.
Part 7
Can better emissions data change who pays?
Emissions evidence can change the number of certificates in the calculation, but it does not by itself decide economic incidence. For non-electricity goods, the Regulation allows actual emissions or applicable default values under its methods.C-006 Actual-emissions use carries verification requirements.C-007 A registered third-country operator can calculate installation emissions, ensure accredited verification and disclose the information to an authorised declarant, but Article 10 uses voluntary “may register” and “may disclose” language.C-010C-030 A commercial data obligation should therefore not be presented as a universal statutory supplier duty.
Quantity channel
A different supported emissions value changes the starting certificate quantity.
Commercial channel
A cleaner verified offer may affect supplier competitiveness or negotiation.
Evidence-cost channel
Measurement, verification, data exchange and remediation have their own costs.
Do not assume that actual values are always lower than defaults, that defaults are always punitive, or that data cost is automatically smaller than certificate savings. Compare both permitted routes using the same goods, production period, verification status and price assumptions. Use the supplier data request template for the operational request and the goods checker for product-level scope orientation.
Part 8
How does a foreign carbon price affect the chain?
The declaration's certificate total is reduced for the permitted third-country carbon-price channel and adjusted for free allocation.C-005 Where actual emissions are used, the Regulation requires an effectively paid carbon price and accounts for rebates or compensation; documentation, certification and payment evidence apply.C-008 Where emissions use default values, Article 9 describes a yearly default-carbon-price route.C-009 That enabling framework does not prove that a usable country default price or every detailed implementing mechanic was available at this report's cut-off; the relevant adopted implementing act was not identified on the Commission's legislation index.C-031
Five separate questions
- 1. Coverage: Is the payment tied to the declared embedded emissions?
- 2. Effective payment: Was money or allowance value actually paid?
- 3. Rebates: Was compensation available that reduces the effective amount?
- 4. Evidence route: Actual-payment documentation or default-carbon-price route?
- 5. Commercial owner: Who collects, certifies and delivers the evidence by the contract deadline?
The deduction can lower certificates to surrender without dictating who keeps the value. A supplier may price the lower exposure into its offer, an importer may retain the benefit, or competition may transmit it downstream. That allocation requires commercial evidence.
Part 9
Which commercial handoffs deserve explicit review?
Contracts can allocate data delivery, audit cooperation, price review, documentation and commercial remedies. They do not rewrite the Regulation's statutory actor. This report does not provide clauses or contracting advice; it identifies questions for procurement, finance, commercial and qualified advisers.
| Handoff | Question to resolve | Evidence | Failure if vague |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emissions data | What method, period, installation and verification state must arrive? | calculation file, verifier output, version/date | late default-value exposure or unusable actuals |
| Carbon price | Who provides payment, rebate and certification evidence? | payment record, law reference, independent certification | unsupported reduction assumption |
| Price review | Which verified input triggers a commercial discussion and when? | price basis, calculation date, notice trail | double recovery, dispute or margin surprise |
| Corrections | How are later data changes reconciled commercially? | version history and approved adjustment record | stale invoices or unrecoverable differences |
| Confidentiality | What can move from operator to declarant and adviser? | access map and permitted disclosure record | missing evidence or inappropriate exposure |
Part 10
How can the effect travel beyond the importer?
Covered goods are often production inputs. The OECD model propagates covered-input price changes through direct importer and indirect value-chain channels.C-022 In that framework, the impact varies with country-sector emissions intensity and carbon pricing; sourcing can shift towards lower-emission-intensity origin countries or country-sector sources.C-023 These are model mechanisms, not installation-level supplier rankings or observed company outcomes.
Certificate estimate
Goods × embedded emissions × adjustments × certificate price
Landed/input cost
Commercial price plus internal and evidence costs
Product economics
Input share, yield, substitution and contribution margin
Market response
Customer price, quantity, product mix and competitor position
A small certificate amount per tonne can still matter in a low-margin or high-input-share product. A larger amount may be manageable if the buyer can switch supply, redesign, recover price or sell a differentiated product. The certificate estimate is therefore the beginning of the commercial analysis, not the end. Use the CBAM cost calculator for deterministic certificate scenarios before adding margin and market-response layers.
Part 11
How should a company build low, base and high cases?
Figure 4
Decision-support synthesisUse one incidence worksheet—not one confident number
1. Actor map
legal declarant, data owner, cash owner and decision owner
2. Exposure register
goods, quantity, origin, installation, period and method
3. Certificate output
imported calculator result with source date and assumptions
4. Recovery bridge
supplier concession, internal cost, customer recovery and retained margin
5. Cash calendar
purchase, holding, surrender, repurchase and collateral dates
6. Reconciliation
actual price, volume, sourcing and margin outcome versus the case
| Input | Low case | Base case | High case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Embedded emissions | Verified lower-intensity case | Best supported expected method | Applicable conservative/default case |
| Foreign carbon price | Maximum evidenced eligible reduction | Expected eligible reduction | No unsupported reduction |
| Certificate price | Lower bounded assumption | Current planning assumption | Higher bounded assumption |
| Supplier response | Price concession / cleaner offer | Partial negotiation | No concession or constrained supply |
| Customer response | High recovery | Partial recovery | Margin absorption / volume loss |
| Substitution | Feasible near-term alternative | Limited alternative | Locked specification or capacity |
A scenario is useful only when every input names its evidence owner, date, unit and unresolved dependency. “Low” is not automatically best case and “high” is not a forecast. Use the cost calculator for deterministic certificate estimates, then model commercial recovery separately. C-025
CBAM Pulse · research cut-off 10 August 2026 · cbampulse.com/guides/who-pays-for-cbam
Keep the deterministic certificate calculation separate from commercial incidence. First calculate a traceable range for embedded emissions, eligible carbon-price reduction, free-allocation adjustment and certificate price. Then add supplier price response, internal costs, customer recovery, substitution, volume and timing. That prevents a negotiated surcharge or accounting assumption from contaminating the statutory estimate.
Minimum scenario record
- • owner and decision date for each input
- • unit, goods, origin and production/import period
- • source or document version
- • legal/mechanical versus commercial assumption
- • low/base/high rationale
- • trigger that causes reforecasting
- • cash timing separate from P&L
- • held items that cannot yet be quantified
Copy the six-block incidence worksheet
1. ACTOR MAP Legal declarant: Data owner / verifier: Certificate cash owner: Procurement / treasury / sales decision owners: 2. EXPOSURE REGISTER Goods / CN code: Quantity / unit / origin / installation / period: Actual or default emissions route: 3. CERTIFICATE OUTPUT Calculator result / source date: Carbon-price and free-allocation adjustments: Low / base / high assumptions: 4. RECOVERY BRIDGE Supplier concession: Internal and evidence cost: Customer recovery: Retained margin effect: 5. CASH CALENDAR Purchase / holding / surrender dates: Repurchase / cancellation / collateral assumptions: 6. EX-POST RECONCILIATION Actual price / volume / sourcing / margin outcome: Difference from case and reforecast trigger:
Where applicable, the operative free-allocation adjustment reduces certificate surrender; it is not a simple percentage of “full CBAM payable,” and the adjustment for electrical energy is zero.C-024 Use the factor and free-allocation phase-in guide for the canonical formula and schedule and the certificate-price tool for price mechanics.
Proposal firewall: COM(2026) 616 remains a Commission proposal at the research cut-off. It does not replace the adopted phase-in or create an adopted downstream extension.C-034
Part 12
What should each team do next?
EU importer / declarant
Decision: Separate certificate cash needs from the portion that can be repriced, negotiated or absorbed.
What to collect next: Goods, quantities, emissions method, origin, eligible carbon price, purchase timing, supplier terms and customer pricing constraints.
Non-EU producer
Decision: Test whether verified lower emissions or eligible carbon-price evidence changes competitiveness enough to justify action.
What to collect next: Installation-level emissions, verification path, carbon-price payment/rebate evidence, EU customer mix and alternative markets.
Procurement / supply chain
Decision: Compare supplier total-cost ranges without assuming the lowest quoted goods price remains cheapest.
What to collect next: Supplier emissions evidence, contract renewal dates, substitution options, lead times, concentration and quality constraints.
Finance / treasury
Decision: Model certificate funding timing separately from annual expense and commercial recovery.
What to collect next: Import calendar, quarterly holdings, expected surrender, price assumptions, repurchase limits and working-capital policy.
Sales / commercial
Decision: Choose where evidence supports a surcharge, repricing discussion or margin decision.
What to collect next: Customer elasticity, contract adjustment rights, competitor exposure, product contribution margins and renewal windows.
Downstream manufacturer
Decision: Identify products where covered inputs are material and substitution is commercially feasible.
What to collect next: Bill of materials, input shares, alternative grades/suppliers, redesign time and customer pass-through constraints.
Adviser / association
Decision: Build scenarios that travel with assumptions rather than repeating a universal payer claim.
What to collect next: Actor map, legal status, model contract, sector/product evidence, sensitivity ranges and explicit non-inferences.
Policy / research
Decision: Distinguish statutory incidence, modelled pass-through and observed outcomes in evaluation.
What to collect next: Prices, margins, quantities, sourcing, emissions methods and comparator data over time.
Part 13
A briefing-ready summary that keeps the caveats
CBAM's legal certificate obligation sits with the authorised declarant for the relevant import flow, but final economic incidence can be distributed across importers, non-EU producers, intermediaries, downstream manufacturers and customers. The allocation depends on verified/default emissions, eligible foreign carbon-price evidence, certificate timing, contracts, bargaining power, substitution and demand. Institutional modelling shows that pass-through assumptions materially change the magnitude of results; it does not supply one company pass-through rate. Management should therefore approve a range with named evidence owners rather than one unsupported “who pays” percentage.
Safe to say
- • The legal payer and final economic bearer are different questions.
- • Pass-through varies by product, market structure and time.
- • Emissions and carbon-price evidence can alter certificates to surrender.
- • Company incidence needs company evidence and sensitivity analysis.
Not supported
- • One actor always bears the CBAM cost.
- • A literature range predicts a specific company result.
- • Better supplier data necessarily lowers the amount.
- • A full-phase model is a 2026 budget forecast.
Part 14
Methodology, evidence classes and limitations
This report starts with the consolidated legal text for actor, declaration, emissions, deduction and certificate mechanics. It uses the OECD supply-chain paper for explicit model assumptions and sensitivity—not as current law or observed definitive-period incidence. Historical Commission modelling and World Bank exposure work remain supporting boundary sources rather than interchangeable estimates.
| Evidence class | Can answer | Cannot establish |
|---|---|---|
| Adopted law | statutory actor, timing and mechanism | final price/margin incidence |
| Institutional model scenario | what changes under explicit assumptions | observed result or company forecast |
| Peer-reviewed / empirical synthesis | historical range and mechanism evidence | a direct CBAM parameter without applicability proof |
| Bounded synthesis | a decision framework joining supported mechanisms | law, observed fact or guaranteed outcome |
| Held — not claimed | what the evidence does not yet support | a conclusion through omission |
Research cut-off: 10 August 2026. The definitive regime is young, so observed final-incidence evidence is limited. Prices, margins and contracts are often private; changes can be confounded by energy, freight, exchange-rate, demand and other policy shocks. The report therefore rejects a universal payer conclusion and keeps company scenarios separate from institutional model results.
Part 15
Claim ledger: what supports every material statement
The authorised CBAM declarant is the central statutory actor for import, declaration and certificate obligations.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Articles 4–6
- Limitation
- Representation and threshold cases must be checked against the exact consolidated provisions.
- Prohibited inference
- The authorised declarant necessarily bears the final economic cost.
An indirect customs representative can act as authorised CBAM declarant and then carries the Regulation's importer obligations for the represented goods.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 5(1a), (2) and (2a)
- Limitation
- The result depends on establishment, appointment, agreement and the represented import flow.
- Prohibited inference
- Every customs representative is automatically the CBAM payer.
Delegating submission of the declaration does not remove the authorised declarant's responsibility under the Regulation.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 5(7a)
- Limitation
- This is a statutory responsibility boundary, not advice on private recourse.
- Prohibited inference
- Commercial contracts cannot allocate operational work or financial risk.
The first definitive-period declaration is due by 30 September 2027 for calendar year 2026.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 6(1)
- Limitation
- This states the consolidated text checked at the research cut-off and must be rechecked before later reuse.
- Prohibited inference
- All certificate cash leaves the business only on the declaration deadline.
The declared certificate total is calculated after the permitted carbon-price reduction and the free-allocation adjustment.
- Evidence
- S-001 · Article 6(2)(c)
- Limitation
- Each adjustment has its own eligibility, evidence and calculation rules.
- Prohibited inference
- A foreign charge or supplier statement automatically reduces surrender.
For non-electricity goods, embedded emissions may be determined using actual emissions or applicable default values under the Regulation's methods.
- Evidence
- S-001 · Article 7(2) and Annex IV
- Limitation
- Method availability and requirements differ by good and implementing rules.
- Prohibited inference
- A declarant may freely select whichever value produces the lowest cost.
Actual-emissions declarations require verification by an appropriately accredited verifier under the definitive rules.
- Evidence
- S-001 · Article 8(1)
- Limitation
- Accreditation scope, timing and verification requirements remain controlling.
- Prohibited inference
- Any consultant or supplier assurance is sufficient verification.
A carbon-price reduction based on actual emissions requires an effectively paid third-country carbon price, net of rebates or compensation.
- Evidence
- S-001 · Article 9(1)–(3)
- Limitation
- Documentation, certification, payment and retention conditions apply.
- Prohibited inference
- Any carbon tax, climate policy or nominal allowance price is deductible.
Where default emissions are used, a carbon-price reduction is possible only through an applicable yearly default carbon price determined and published by the Commission.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-017 · Article 9(4)–(5); Commission legislation index checked 2026-08-10
- Limitation
- No applicable published default price or adopted Article 9(5) implementing act was identified at the research cut-off.
- Prohibited inference
- A declarant can presently rely on a default foreign-carbon-price deduction without an applicable published value and method.
A registered third-country operator may calculate installation emissions, ensure accredited verification, prepare carbon-price information and disclose it to an authorised declarant.
- Evidence
- S-001 · Articles 8(1) and 10(5)–(7)
- Limitation
- Registration and disclosure are voluntary; disclosure supports the declarant but does not make the operator the verifier or transfer the declarant's obligation.
- Prohibited inference
- The producer verifies its own data, must disclose under Article 10, or becomes liable for certificate surrender.
Certificate sales begin from 1 February 2027 through the common central platform to authorised declarants.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 20(1)
- Limitation
- Platform procedures and fees must be read with applicable delegated measures.
- Prohibited inference
- A 2026 import necessarily requires a certificate purchase during 2026.
The general certificate price uses weekly EU ETS auction closing-price averages, while 2026 embedded emissions use the relevant quarterly-average rule.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 21(1) and (1a)
- Limitation
- This is the statutory price mechanism, not a future price forecast.
- Prohibited inference
- A spot EUA quote is the definitive certificate cost for every import.
The first surrender occurs by 30 September 2027 for 2026 emissions, and the authorised declarant must have the required certificates in its Registry account.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 22(1)
- Limitation
- The amount still depends on verified/default emissions and statutory adjustments.
- Prohibited inference
- Surrender timing alone identifies annual accounting expense or working-capital need.
From 2027, a quarterly account-balance requirement references at least 50% of embedded emissions under the permitted calculation routes.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 22(2) and (2a)
- Limitation
- The rule includes specified methods, prior-year conditions and threshold timing.
- Prohibited inference
- Every importer must continuously pre-fund 50% from the first day of 2026.
Repurchase is request-based, time-limited and quantity-limited, with the repurchase price tied to the original purchase price.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 23
- Limitation
- Special 2026/2027 timing and threshold cases apply.
- Prohibited inference
- Excess certificates are always liquid or can be sold freely at the current market price.
Older unused certificates can be cancelled without compensation under the statutory timetable.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 24
- Limitation
- The 2027 treatment for certificates bought for 2026 emissions has a specific rule.
- Prohibited inference
- Unused certificates remain a perpetual transferable asset.
The OECD supply-chain model's main analysis assumes 100% cost pass-through across sectors.
- Evidence
- S-003 · PDF pp. 30 and 33–34
- Limitation
- The paper states sector and time variation can make pass-through lower.
- Prohibited inference
- Observed CBAM pass-through is 100% for every firm and product.
The OECD's Box 3 summarises mixed-method estimates of EU ETS cost pass-through, including ex-ante simulations and ex-post econometric studies, with wide ranges across sectors and studies.
- Evidence
- S-003 · Box 3, PDF pp. 33–34; endnotes 39–40, PDF p. 55
- Limitation
- These are literature estimates with different methods, periods and products, not observed CBAM outcomes.
- Prohibited inference
- The full range is historical empirical evidence or can be assigned to a company or CBAM transaction.
The OECD paper cites a Belgian-firm estimate of roughly 60% average short-term cost pass-through and uses 60% as a sensitivity case.
- Evidence
- S-003 · PDF pp. 34 and 48
- Limitation
- The estimate is not CBAM-specific and the sensitivity applies one average uniformly across sectors.
- Prohibited inference
- Sixty percent is the correct base case for all CBAM supply chains.
Under the OECD combined-policy Full Policy Mix, changing pass-through from 100% to 60% changes modelled EU value-added results materially.
- Evidence
- S-003 · Table 6, PDF p. 49
- Limitation
- The table combines ETS-price, free-allocation and CBAM policies in a static 2019-based experiment.
- Prohibited inference
- The difference measures how much cost consumers or importers will bear in 2026.
The OECD mechanism permits part of an import price increase to be absorbed by an exporter when an importer has sufficient market power to negotiate lower exporter margins or prices.
- Evidence
- S-003 · Footnote 41, PDF p. 55
- Limitation
- This is a conditional model/economic mechanism rather than an observed allocation.
- Prohibited inference
- Non-EU exporters will absorb the CBAM cost.
The OECD model propagates covered-input price changes into downstream sectors through direct and indirect value-chain channels.
- Evidence
- S-003 · PDF pp. 35 and 42–44
- Limitation
- The magnitude depends on the model's pass-through, substitution, elasticity and baseline assumptions.
- Prohibited inference
- Every downstream firm can or will pass the full change to customers.
In the OECD setup, higher origin emissions intensity and absent carbon pricing worsen the relative price and competitiveness channel compared with cleaner or carbon-priced sources.
- Evidence
- S-003 · PDF p. 35
- Limitation
- This is modelled direction under the paper's country-sector averages and policy assumptions.
- Prohibited inference
- A country ranking determines a supplier's installation-level commercial outcome.
Where applicable, certificate surrender is reduced through the operative free-allocation adjustment; the adjustment for electrical energy is zero.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-005, S-012 · Regulation Article 31; Directive Article 10a(1a); Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2620 Articles 1–4
- Limitation
- The CBAM factor is not a simple percentage of 'full CBAM payable'; use the canonical guide for the operative formula and schedule.
- Prohibited inference
- Every covered good receives an adjustment, or a fully implemented model scenario is a 2026 company cost estimate.
A defensible company analysis needs low, base and high cases for emissions, eligible carbon-price reduction, certificate price, pass-through, supplier response, customer response and volume.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-003 · Regulation Articles 6–10 and 20–24; OECD PDF pp. 33–35 and 48–49
- Limitation
- Scenario ranges are decision support and must be populated with company evidence.
- Prohibited inference
- A scenario is a legal conclusion, quote, budget guarantee or forecast.
No universal final payer or pass-through percentage is claimed for CBAM.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-003, S-007 · Legal actor rules; OECD assumptions and limitations; exposure-method limitations
- Limitation
- Observed definitive-period evidence is not yet sufficient to identify one final-incidence rule.
- Prohibited inference
- Importer, exporter, downstream buyer or consumer always bears the burden.
Where the importer is not established in a Member State, the indirect customs representative must obtain authorised-CBAM-declarant status.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 5(2)
- Limitation
- The mass-threshold exemption can remove substantive obligations while customs identity and monitoring remain relevant.
- Prohibited inference
- The non-EU seller, buyer or customs intermediary necessarily absorbs the commercial cost.
Once the single mass-based threshold is exceeded during a year, the Regulation applies to embedded emissions in all covered goods imported by that importer during that calendar year.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002 · Article 2a(1)–(4)
- Limitation
- The rule is per importer; electricity and hydrogen are excluded from the mass-based exemption. Use the threshold guide for full scope detail.
- Prohibited inference
- Only shipments after the crossing point create exposure, or group-wide tonnage can be used without checking customs identities.
The authorised declarant is the statutory certificate purchaser, and the Regulation permits common-platform costs to be financed by fees payable by authorised declarants.
- Evidence
- S-001 · Article 20(1), (4), (5) and (5a)
- Limitation
- No fee amount is estimated in this report; detailed fee operation depends on applicable measures.
- Prohibited inference
- A published or universal platform-fee amount is already available, or the declarant must economically absorb it.
An operator's registration and disclosure route is voluntary language: an operator may register and may disclose verified emissions and carbon-price information.
- Evidence
- S-001 · Article 10(1), (5) and (7)
- Limitation
- Commercial arrangements can still require data delivery; the statutory operator route does not transfer declarant responsibility.
- Prohibited inference
- Every foreign supplier is legally required to register or disclose through Article 10.
The Article 9 default-carbon-price framework does not establish that a usable country default price or all detailed implementing mechanics were available at the research cut-off.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-017 · Article 9(4)–(5); Commission legislation index checked 2026-08-10
- Limitation
- Article 9 says the Commission may determine and publish yearly defaults from 2027; the relevant adopted implementing act was not identified on the official index at the cut-off.
- Prohibited inference
- A declarant can presently rely on a default foreign-carbon-price deduction without an applicable published value and method.
For 2026 imports, the certificate price is tied to the quarter of import, while external certificate sales begin on 1 February 2027 and first surrender falls on 30 September 2027.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-002, S-011 · Articles 20(1), 21(1a), 22(1) and 36(2)(d)
- Limitation
- This separates statutory price attribution from cash purchase; it does not set supplier, broker or customer settlement dates.
- Prohibited inference
- The EU collects certificate cash at import clearance during 2026.
Certain newly established authorisation applicants must provide a guarantee, but that collateral requirement is not a CBAM certificate purchase.
- Evidence
- S-001, S-008, S-009 · Article 17(5); authorised-declarant implementing procedures
- Limitation
- Applicant facts and competent-authority decisions determine the exact requirement.
- Prohibited inference
- The authorisation guarantee is the CBAM charge or final certificate liability.
COM(2026) 616 remains a Commission proposal and does not replace the adopted phase-in schedule at the research cut-off.
- Evidence
- S-005, S-019 · Directive Article 10a(1a); COM(2026) 616 title and status
- Limitation
- Recheck only after final adoption and Official Journal publication.
- Prohibited inference
- A proposed phase-in amendment or downstream extension is current law.
Part 16
Source register
European Union — Regulation (EU) 2023/956 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism — consolidated text
Locator: Articles 3–10 and 20–24
Used for: Current actor, declaration, evidence, certificate, surrender, repurchase and cancellation mechanics.
Open sourceEuropean Union — Regulation (EU) 2025/2083 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956
Locator: Amendments to Articles 2a, 5–10 and 20–26
Used for: Definitive-period simplification and timing amendments reflected in the consolidated text.
Open sourceOECD — The Potential Effects of the EU CBAM Along the Supply Chain
Locator: Working Paper 2025/02, PDF pp. 30, 33–35, 48–50 and 55
Used for: Pass-through assumptions, sensitivity, exporter absorption, downstream propagation and model limits.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — SWD(2021) 643 final — CBAM impact assessment
Locator: Part 1, report pp. 45–72; Part 2, Annex 10
Used for: Historical proposal-stage model and policy-design context only.
Open sourceEuropean Union — Directive (EU) 2023/959 amending the EU ETS
Locator: Article 10a(1a) amendment
Used for: Adopted CBAM-sector free-allocation phase-out context.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — COM(2025) 783 final — report on application of the CBAM Regulation
Locator: Application report and annexes
Used for: Observed operational boundary and later policy assessment context.
Open sourceWorld Bank — CBAM Exposure Indices — Methodological Note
Locator: June 2025, methodology and limitations
Used for: Exposure-metric boundary: exposure is not realised loss or final incidence.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/486 — authorised CBAM declarant procedures
Locator: Authorisation procedure and criteria
Used for: Definitive-period authorisation procedures; read with the 2025/2549 correction.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2549 — amendment of authorised-declarant procedures
Locator: Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2025/486
Used for: Current authorised-declarant procedure boundary.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2547 — definitive embedded-emissions methods
Locator: Methods, reporting periods, production routes and precursors
Used for: Detailed definitive-period calculation methods; not reproduced in this incidence report.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2548 — CBAM certificate-price calculation
Locator: Certificate-price calculation and publication
Used for: Adopted price methodology; detailed operation remains owned by the certificate-price guide.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2620 — free-allocation adjustment
Locator: Articles 1–4 and Annex points 2–5
Used for: Operative adjustment mechanics; detailed schedule and formula remain with the phase-in guide.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2621 — definitive default values
Locator: Legally binding default-value tables
Used for: Default-value source; values are not duplicated in this report.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1740 — corrections to definitive default values
Locator: Correcting provisions
Used for: Current correction boundary for the default-value source.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2546 — verification principles
Locator: Definitive-period verification requirements
Used for: Verification detail supporting the actual-emissions evidence route.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/2551 — accreditation and verification
Locator: Verifier and accreditation framework
Used for: Accreditation boundary supporting the actual-emissions route.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — CBAM legislation and guidance index
Locator: Legal texts, default values, benchmarks and guidance
Used for: Completeness and adopted-versus-proposal status check at the research cut-off.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism hub
Locator: Definitive regime and certificate-price sections
Used for: Official operational-status orientation, subordinate to legislation.
Open sourceEuropean Commission — COM(2026) 616 final — proposed EU ETS/CBAM-factor amendments
Locator: Proposal for a Directive
Used for: Proposal/current-law firewall only; not used as adopted law.
Open sourcePart 17
Practical FAQ
Does the importer pay for CBAM?
The authorised declarant holds the statutory certificate obligation for the relevant flow. Whether the importer ultimately absorbs the burden depends on contracts, supplier/customer pricing, market power, substitution, quantities and time.
Who is responsible when an indirect customs representative is used?
For an EU-established importer, the representative becomes the authorised declarant where the statutory appointment conditions apply and it agrees. For a non-EU-established importer, the representative must obtain the status. Commercial reimbursement remains a separate question.
Can the importer charge the supplier?
A commercial adjustment may be negotiated, but the report does not determine contract rights or recommend clauses. Document the legal actor separately from any supplier price or evidence arrangement.
What if the 50-tonne threshold is crossed late in the year?
Under the current mass-based rule, crossing reaches all covered goods imported by that importer in the calendar year, not only later shipments. Electricity and hydrogen do not receive that exemption.
Will consumers pay more?
Possibly in some chains, but not as a universal conclusion. Costs may be shared through supplier prices, importer/downstream margins, customer prices, lower volumes, substitution or investment responses.
What pass-through percentage should we use?
Use a range supported by your product and market evidence. The OECD 100% main assumption and 60% sensitivity show model sensitivity; neither is a default company forecast.
Do actual emissions always reduce the cost?
No. Compare the permitted actual and default routes for the same goods and period, including verification and data costs. Actual values can be higher, lower or not usable.
Does any foreign carbon tax reduce CBAM?
No blanket rule is safe. The consolidated Regulation requires the relevant effectively paid carbon price and accounts for rebates/compensation, with route-specific evidence.
Is the certificate price the same as today's EUA spot price?
The Regulation defines averaging rules, including a quarterly-average treatment for 2026 embedded emissions. Use the canonical certificate-price guide rather than a single market quote.
How should finance budget it?
Separate import exposure, certificate-price and emissions estimates, purchase/holding/surrender cash dates, expected repurchase, accounting treatment, supplier recovery and customer recovery.
Are platform fees or authorisation guarantees the certificate cost?
No. Fees and a possible applicant guarantee are separate cash or collateral channels. This report does not estimate fee amounts or treat a guarantee as certificate expenditure.
Are proposed downstream CBAM extensions already law?
No. This report keeps proposal-stage measures outside current-law diagrams unless and until final adoption and Official Journal publication are verified.
What is the first useful output?
A one-page actor map plus low/base/high assumptions with evidence owners and reforecast triggers. Do not begin with one final burden number.
Turn the report into your own evidence map
Check the goods, build a deterministic certificate scenario, request supplier evidence, then track the unresolved commercial handoffs in the preparation workspace.
CBAM Pulse provides general information and productivity tools based on publicly available official sources. It does not provide legal, tax, customs or professional advice, does not determine your obligations, and does not file declarations. Verify decisions with the applicable authorities and qualified advisers.