For your role

CBAM preparation for non-EU exporters and producers

CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism) concerns certain goods imported into the EU. Non-EU suppliers can prepare for customer requests by connecting goods to the producing installation, explaining the emissions-data basis, and keeping evidence and open questions together.

Last updated: 2026-10-14 · Sources: Regulation (EU) 2023/956 (consolidated text) · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2547 — emissions calculation · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2546 — verification · European Commission Guidance No. 1 — CBAM concepts, 14 August 2026 (non-binding) · European Commission Guidance No. 2 — non-EU operators, 14 August 2026 (non-binding) · European Commission — communication template and explanatory resources · European Commission — current CBAM legislation and guidance

Who this is for

Non-EU exporters, manufacturers and installation operators supplying EU customers, including traders that need to find the producer behind a goods line. A seller may hold commercial records while another organisation controls the production data; start with the role and information you can actually provide.

First questions to answer

• Which goods and known CN codes is the EU customer asking about?
• Are we the exporter, manufacturer, installation operator, or an intermediary connecting those parties?
• Which installation, production process and reporting period does the requested data cover?
• What is the emissions-data basis, which evidence exists, and what remains unavailable?
• How can we return a traceable answer and reuse it for compatible customer requests?

Recommended starting path

1. 1. Connect the customer's goods question to a known CN code

   Read the current-scope explanation, then use the checker and CN list to explore a known code. These resources support the supplier conversation; they do not choose a customs classification or decide an individual shipment.

   • CN goods checker
   • Browse the current CBAM CN list
2. 2. Identify the producing operator and information route

   Separate the customer, commercial exporter and producing installation. Follow the actor map when a request needs to pass through a trader to the operator that holds the production records.

3. 3. Review the customer's request field by field

   The public template is primarily an EU importer's request-drafting aid. Suppliers can use its fields to understand a request and list available information; review and exchange the response through your own agreed channel.

   • Supplier request and follow-up guide
   • Supplier data and evidence guide
4. 4. Keep actual and default emissions bases distinct

   Use the guide to label the basis of supplied information. Its declaration-preparation route checks are for the EU importer or declarant; a comparison alone does not select a method for a shipment.

5. 5. Connect production records to verification context

   Understand the difference between an operator emissions report and an accredited verifier's report, then retain the installation, goods, period and report-version references in the handoff.

   • Review evidence references and open gaps
6. 6. Find the binding acts and explanatory guidance

   Read the official source behind a question and distinguish adopted law from guidance or a proposal. The Commission operator guides explain the process; the cited regulations govern the applicable requirements.

What does CBAM mean for a non-EU supplier?

EU customers may need production and emissions information for goods within CBAM scope. The useful supplier task is to identify the goods, the producing installation and the data owner, then return information with its basis and limitations clearly stated.

An exporter arranges or sells goods for export; a manufacturer produces them; an installation operator operates or controls the producing installation. These roles may belong to one organisation or different parties. Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 defines the operator role; Commission Guidance No. 2, pages 5–6, explains why a trader may need to pass a request to the actual producer.

Article 6 of the amended regulation assigns the annual CBAM declaration to the authorised CBAM declarant. Supplying production information does not transfer that EU-side role to every exporter. Confirm which commercial and production records you hold and who can answer the remaining questions, rather than promising the same data from every party in the chain.

Which exported goods may be relevant?

Start with the goods in the customer's request and the known CN code. Current CBAM goods scope follows Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2023/956, as amended, rather than a broad description such as metal products or a supplier's entire catalogue.

Match the customer's description to your product or purchase reference and record where the CN code came from. The goods checker and CN list help explore the current published scope for that code. If the code is unknown or disputed, return the product information to the customer's customs review route; a software lookup cannot supply the missing classification decision.

A scope match is one part of the EU customer's assessment. Its annual threshold, customs arrangements and declarant questions belong in the importer workflow. Keep possible future scope in a separate proposal watch note so it does not change the basis of the current supplier request.

What might an EU customer request?

A useful request connects recognisable goods to the operator, installation, production process, reporting period, emissions-data basis and supporting report references. Ask the customer to clarify which goods and missing fields it needs before assembling a broad document pack.

For the actual-values method, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2547, Article 10 and Annex IV, identify the operator emissions report and summary content. Commission Guidance No. 2, pages 14–15, explains this handoff. Purchase orders and shared request identifiers are practical ways to match a reply to the customer; they are not a new prescribed CBAM form.

Consider the illustrative chain already mapped in the exporter–importer data-flow guide: Importer Delta buys through Trader Alpha and Exporter Beta, while Operator Gamma holds the production records. Beta forwards Delta's goods and period question to Gamma, then returns Gamma's installation, report and verification references through the agreed channel. If Gamma is still unknown, Beta returns that gap instead of substituting its own corporate footprint. The names are synthetic and the example contains no emissions figures or shipment determination.

• Goods context: product description, known CN code, reporting period and a shared customer reference.
• Production context: operator and installation identity, production process or route, and the goods covered by the records.
• Emissions context: value and unit where available, actual/default or mixed basis, relevant direct/indirect and precursor context, and method reference.
• Evidence context: operator-report version, supporting references, verification report where relevant, follow-up contact and unresolved fields.

Which emissions information and data basis are relevant?

Actual emissions and official default values are different data bases. Actual information comes from installation-level production and the applicable calculation method; defaults come from the official published rules and values, rather than measurements made by the exporter.

Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 distinguishes the actual and default methods, with specific treatment for electricity. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2547, Article 3, sets calculation system boundaries. Depending on the goods and method, a request may concern direct production emissions, electricity-related indirect emissions and relevant precursors. Do not assume that every field or the same calculation applies to every exported product.

State the installation, period, method and unit alongside any figure you provide. Label supplier-reported actual candidates separately from official defaults and from actual data accompanied by accredited verification. If precursor information uses a different basis, keep that distinction visible. A trader may coordinate these answers without having access to the underlying monitoring records; the actual/default guide provides the EU-side method context without selecting a declaration treatment here.

Which records and verification references help the handoff?

Keep the operator emissions report, its supporting production and monitoring references, and any accredited verification report separately identified. The record should show which installation, goods, period and version each item covers.

For declared actual emissions, Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 requires the authorised CBAM declarant to ensure accredited verification. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2546 governs the verification principles. A supplier spreadsheet or an internal review is a different evidence state from an accredited verifier's report; preserve the report's scope, opinion, findings and version when one is available.

For actual-values reporting, use the current Article 10 and Annex IV requirements in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2547 as the source for report content. The Commission's public communication workbook updated on 18 December 2024 is a transitional-period reference, not a required definitive-period format. Commission Guidance Nos. 1 and 2 are non-binding explanations. The public CBAM Pulse request tool is an adaptable draft for communication, not the official operator report or a verification service.

How can suppliers prepare for repeated customer requests?

Maintain a reusable information index for each producing installation, goods group and reporting period, with a contact owner, report versions, evidence locations and known gaps. Map each customer's request to that index instead of rebuilding the same answer from email attachments.

Compare the new request with the records already held: goods, installation, period, method and evidence state. Reuse a record only where that context matches, and explain any difference. Retain earlier versions and tell affected recipients when a correction changes the information previously supplied.

Agree the recipient and communication channel before sharing supporting material, especially when an intermediary only needs a reference or summary. This is a practical organisation pattern, not a uniform exporter obligation. The public resources help structure the questions and gaps; they do not provide a supplier portal, exporter account workflow or automated document exchange.

What can a supplier do when information is unavailable?

Give a precise partial response: name the missing field, the affected goods and period, the likely data owner, and the next follow-up. A visible gap gives the customer something to resolve; an unsupported replacement figure hides the problem.

If you are an intermediary, ask the upstream contact to identify the producing operator or route the production question to it. If you are the operator, separate records that are unavailable from records that exist but need clarification, permission to disclose, or verification. Keep the original request and response so a later revision can be traced.

Do not turn missing data into zero, a corporate footprint or a default selected without the applicable method context. Tell the EU customer what is unresolved and let its declarant or appropriate qualified reviewer address the next step. CBAM Pulse can explain the source and organise a checklist; it does not determine the treatment of a particular shipment.

• Producer or installation unknown: record the upstream contact and the identification question.
• Period, goods or method mismatch: state the conflict and request a corrected reference.
• Evidence or verification unavailable: retain the supplied basis and mark the missing report or review context.

Questions from non-EU suppliers preparing CBAM information